Follow Us

FacebookTwitterRSSStumble UponDigg

Tags: , ,

Tackling climate change offers economic benefits


October 4, 2012

VANCOUVER, BC, Oct 4, 2012/ Troy Media/ – The failure of world leaders to act on the critical issue of global warming is often blamed on economic considerations. Over and over, we hear politicians say they can’t spend our tax dollars on environmental protection when the economy is so fragile.

Putting aside the absurdity of prioritizing a human-created and adaptable tool like the economy over caring for everything that allows us to survive and be healthy, let’s take a look at the economic reality.

A new scientific report concludes that climate change is already costing the world $1.2 trillion a year and is eating up 1.6 per cent of global GDP, and rising. It’s also killing at least 400,000 people every year, mainly in developing countries. That’s not counting the 4.5 million people a year who die from air pollution caused by burning fossil fuels.

The report, Climate Vulnerability Monitor: A Guide to the Cold Calculus of a Hot Planet, was compiled by 50 scientists, economists and experts for the Europe-based non-governmental organization DARA and 20 countries that joined to form the Climate Vulnerable Forum.

As Michael Zammit Cutajar, former executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, told the Guardian: ‘Climate change is not just a distant threat but a present danger – its economic impact is already with us.’

But we’re to believe that corporate profits, ever-increasing growth, consumer culture, disposable products and often-meaningless jobs to keep it all going are more important than the health and survival of humans and other species, and true long-term economic prosperity.

As stated in the preface, the report ‘challenges a conventional view: that global action on climate change is a cost to society. Instead, it enlightens our understanding of how tackling climate change through coordinated efforts between nations would actually produce much-needed benefits for all.’

The report’s authors also conclude that the challenges of global poverty and climate change ‘can be tackled simultaneously with the same policy framework that would shift our development path to a low-carbon footing,’ creating ‘jobs, investment opportunities, new possibilities for international cooperation and technological deployment to the benefit of all.’

Although the researchers note that adaptation must be part of any climate change strategy, they caution that ‘treating only the symptoms but not the cause of the climate crisis would result in spectacular economic losses for the world economy.’

It shouldn’t be surprising to realize that using finite resources in a wasteful manner and at a pace much faster than the Earth’s ability to replenish them is economic folly. Nor should we be surprised to learn that polluting, damaging and destroying the natural systems that keep us alive and healthy will not be good for our long-term prosperity, economic or otherwise.

Rapid population growth and technological innovation, combined with our lack of understanding about how the natural systems of which we are a part work, have created a mess. We have altered the physical, chemical and biological properties of the planet on a geological scale. We have left no part of the globe untouched. French scientists who recently completed a two-and-half-year journey covering more than 112,000 kilometres through the Atlantic, Pacific, Antarctic and Indian oceans found plastic debris in a remote ocean area that was thought to be pristine.

Researchers on the boat Tara, who were studying the effects of climate change on marine ecosystems and biodiversity, found plastic fragments in the Southern Ocean and Antarctica at levels comparable to the global average. ‘The fact that we found these plastics is a sign that the reach of human beings is truly planetary in scale,’ said Chris Bowler, scientific co-ordinator of Tara Oceans, quoted in the Guardian. It also reminds us that we live on a planet where everything is connected.

We must learn to shift our ways of thinking. We have to stop using so many disposable plastic items and fossil fuels. We need to conserve resources and energy and stop being so destructive. The DARA report offers many recommendations for governments, policy-makers, civil society, the private sector and the international development and humanitarian communities.

Its advice for communicators applies to all of us: question received wisdom, recognize awareness of risks as an opportunity and take a stand. Economies must function to serve people, not just short-sighted and often-destructive corporate interests.

Written with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation Communications Manager Ian Hanington.

Dr. David Suzuki is a scientist, broadcaster, author, and co-founder of the David Suzuki Foundation.

This column is FREE to use on your websites or in your publications. However, Troy Media, with a link to its web site, MUST be credited.  

Editor's suggestions
Teachers’ journal wants questions about climate change suppressed
September 27, 2012 'There is one feature I notice that is generally missing in "cargo cult science." It's a kind of scientific integrity . . . you should report everything (in ...
READ MORE
Report demolishes Stern Review on climate change
September 11, 2012 EDMONTON, AB, Sep 11, 2012/ Troy Media/ - The Rt Hon Peter Lilley, MP in the British Parliament and a former cabinet Minister under both Baroness Thatcher and ...
READ MORE
Teachers’ journal wants questions about climate change suppressed
Report demolishes Stern Review on climate change

© Troy Media

ADVERTISEMENT
5 comments
TomHarris
TomHarris

Here is my interview on TV across Canada tonight about misinterpretations of the Climate Vulnerability Monitor and an important misunderstanding of David Suzuki concerning the Monitor report:

 

http://tinyurl.com/9lovucm

RobEllis01
RobEllis01

David, your brand of environmentalism makes me dizzy.  In the first part of your article you quote from the DARA article and focus on the largest problem: climate change caused by human generated carbon dioxide as we harvest energy from fossil fuels.  So far so good, however, you then segue off to a rant on plastics.  This muddies up your whole point.  Consider this, if all of the fossil carbon being produced was diverted into plastic instead of being burned for energy... we would achieve zero CO2 emissions.  Taken to this extreme it seems a silly idea, but every kilo of fossil carbon that does make it into plastic is a kilo that doesn't make it to CO2 production.  Yes, plastic "litter" is a serious problem, however, I find it hard to criticize its production when it looks an awful lot like sequestered carbon to me.  

TomHarris
TomHarris

David Suzuki is wrong to say "That’s not counting the 4.5 million people a year who die from air pollution caused by burning fossil fuels."

 

At least 70% of those 4.5 million died due to indoor air pollution caused by the burning of dung, wood, straw and other biowaste in buildings without proper ventilation due to a lack of chimneys. This has nothing whatsoever to do with "air pollution caused by burning fossil fuels." Even the report, the Climate Vulnerability Monitor, that Dr. Suzuki cites does not make this mistake.

 

Sincerely,

 

Tom Harris

Executive Director

International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC)

 

http://www.climatescienceinternational.org

DavidNutzuki
DavidNutzuki

Climate blame reporting has done to journalism, progressivism and the entire world of science, what naughty priests and suicide bombers did for religion. You knew that science never said it "will" happen, only "might" and "could"....and for 26 years of this needless panic. Climate change was a war crime that condemned billions of helpless children to the greenhouse gas ovens of climate change exaggeration all to sell news, votes and grants. Meanwhile, the entire world of SCIENCE, lazy copy and paste journalism and Liberal progressivism had allowed bank-funded and corporate-run "CARBON TRADING STOCK MARKETS"(ruled by trustworthy politicians) to trump the UN's and entire world's efforts into 3rd world fresh water relief, starvation rescue and 3rd world education for just over 26 years of insane attempts at climate CONTROL.